METHODICAL APPROACHES TO ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIFIC REGIONAL NATURAL USAGE IN GEO-PLANNING ANALYSIS OF TERRITORY

Authors

  • Daria MALCHYKOVA Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2015.73.33-40

Keywords:

territorial planning of region, rural areas, natural usage, geo-planning analysis, planning management

Abstract

The article deals with methodical approaches to the analysis of the specific features of regional nature management in the formation of geo-planning structure in rural areas. It shows the possibility to apply factor analysis for the study of regional nature usage. The taxonomy of regional levels and forms of geo-planning organization of rural areas is presented at the base, integrated and network levels. The model testing of the techniques, allowing picking out geo-planning microregions, was conducted on the example of Kherson region.

References

Regìonal’ne planuvannâ: teorìâ ì praktika [Regional planning: theory and practice], Kyiv, 2003, 246 p. (In Ukrainian).

Bokov V. A., Timčenko I. E., Červanev I. G., Rudyk A. N. 2. Prostranstvenno-vremennoj analiz v territorial’nom menedžmente. Čast’ 1. Učeb. posobie [Spatial and temporal analysis of the territorial management. Part 1. Textbook]. Simferopol’, 2005, 184 p. (In Russian).

Buligìn S. Û., Dumìn Û. D., Kucenko M. V. 3. Ocìnka geografìčnogo seredoviŝa ta optimìzacìâ zemlekoristuvannâ [Assessment of the geographical environment and optimization of land use], Harkìv, 2002, 168 p. (In Ukrainian).

Čarik L. P. 4. Ekologo-geografìčnij analìz ì ocìnûvannâ teritorìï: teorìâ ta praktika (na materìalah Ternopìl’s’koï oblastì) [Ecological and geographical land analysis and evaluation: theory and practice (based on Ternopil region)], Ternopìl’, 2006, 256 p. (In Ukrainian).

Faŝevskij N. I., Palij T. M., Nemčenko M. P. 5. Territorial’naâ organizaciâ žiznedeâtel’nosti naselennâ [Territorial organization of human activity], Kyiv, 1992, 136 p. (In Russian).

General’na shema planuvannâ teritorìï Ukraïni. Poâsnûval’na zapiska: v 2 t.6. [General scheme of territorial planning of Ukraine. Explanatory note. In 2 parts]. Kyiv, DIPROMISTO, 2000. (In Ukrainian).

Horev B. S. 7. Territorial’naâ organizaciâ obŝestva (aktual’nye problemy regional’nogo upravleniâ i planirovaniâ v SSSR) [Territorial organization of society (contemporary issues of regional management and planning in the USSR)]. Moscow, 1981, 320 p. (In Russian).

Malchykova D.S. 8. Teoretiko-metodologìčnì ì metodičnì zasadi geoplanuvannâ sìl’skoï mìscevostì na regìonal’nomu rìvnì [Theoretical, methodological and methodic principals of rural geoplanning on the regional level], Kherson, 2014, 362 p. (In Ukrainian).

Marsden T. New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural spaces. 9. Journal of Rural Studies, 1998, N. 14 (1), pp.107–117.

Mezencev K.V., Pìdgrušnij G.P., Mezenceva N.Ì. Regìonal’nij rozvitok v Ukraïnì: suspìl’no-prostorova 10. nerìvnìst’ ì polârizacìâ. [Regional Development in Ukraine: the socio-spatial inequality and polarization], Kyiv, 2014, 132 p. (In Ukrainian).

Paleha Û., M., Zerkal`M.V., Oleŝenko A.V., Solomaha Ì.V. Metodologìâ provedennâ mìstobudìvnogo nanlìzu 11. pri rozrobcì shemi planuvannâ teritorìj Hersons’koï oblastì [Methodology of the analysis of the development of urban planning schemes Kherson region]. Regìonal’nì problemi Ukraïni: geografìčnij analìz ta pošuk šlâhìv virìšennâ [Regional issues in Ukraine: geographical analysis and search for solutions], Kherson, 2011, pp. 237–245. (In Ukrainian).

Persson L., Westholm E. Towards the new mosaic of rural regions. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1994, N. 21, pp. 409–427.

Pìdgrušnij G.P. Sutnìst’ territorial’noï organìzacìï suspìl’stva ïï zakonomìrnostì, procesi ta formi [The essence of the territorial organization of society: laws, processes and forms]. Regìonal’nì problemi Ukraïni: geografìčnij analìz ta pošuk šlâhìv virìšennâ [Regional issues in Ukraine: geographical analysis and search for solutions]. Kherson, 2011, pp. 253-259. (In Ukrainian).

Pìstun M. D. Osnovi teorìï suspìl’noï geografìï [Bases of the theory of social geography], Kyiv, 1996, 231 p. 14. (In Ukrainian).

Ploeg J. D., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Mannion J. et al. Rural development: from practices and 15. policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, 2000, N. 40, pp. 391–408.

Šablìj O. Ì. Suspìl’na geografìâ: teorìâ, ìstorìâ, ukraïnoznavčì studìï [Social geography: theory, history, 16. Ukrainian studies]. L’vìv, 2001, 744 p. (In Ukrainian).

Šiŝenko P.G. 17. Principy i metody landšaftnogo analiza v regional’nom proektirovanii [The principles and methods of landscape analysis in regional planning], Kyiv, 1999, 284 p. (In Russian).

Topčìêv O. G. 18. Osnovi suspìl’noï geografìï [Bases of the human geography]. Odesa, 2009, 544 p. (In Ukrainian).

Topčìêv O. G. Teritorìâ: sučasnij zmìst ponâttâ; funkcìï; resursnij potencìal [Territory: modern meaning of the 19. term; function; resource potential]. Ukraïns’kij geografìčnij žurnal [Ukrainian Geographical Journal], 2010, N. 4(72), pp. 3–9. (In Ukrainian).

Downloads

Published

2015-12-31

How to Cite

MALCHYKOVA, D. (2015). METHODICAL APPROACHES TO ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIFIC REGIONAL NATURAL USAGE IN GEO-PLANNING ANALYSIS OF TERRITORY. Ekonomichna Ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 73, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2015.73.33-40

Issue

Volume 73 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Daria MALCHYKOVA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The article and any related published material are available under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish the article.