CITY-FORMING ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES: IMPACT ON THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2023.90.34-46Keywords:
city, university city, studentification, socio-economic development, spatial development, Lund, CambridgeAbstract
The article presents the results of an evaluation of universities’ role in shaping cities and impact on their socio-economic and spatial development. Using the examples of Lund and Cambridge as university cities, it examines the positive and negative aspects of studentification. Universities exert a multifaceted influence on city development manifested in economic dynamics, demographic shifts, spatial changes, and community cohesion issues. The specifics of contemporary social, economic, and spatial aspects of "studentification" are highlighted through the case studies of Lund and Cambridge. Concentration of students, constituting nearly a third of residents, emerges as the primary outcome of university influence, affecting population dynamics, shaping age structure, and mitigating population aging. Universities’ pivotal role lies in knowledge production and high-quality personnel training, fostering innovative economic sectors within cities. Assessing universities’ spatial impact on city development, GIS-generated heat maps illustrate the distribution of bicycle infrastructure and service areas in urban spaces. The correlation between bicycle parking, entertainment venues, eateries, and other service facilities concentration with university infrastructure and main student accommodation places is evident. Challenges in city development encompass seasonal load on the city environment and infrastructure, the "city and mantle" phenomenon fostering conflicts between residents and students over urban planning, new housing construction, and use of public spaces, alongside issues of gentrification and spatial segregation. Conducting a SWOT analysis of Lund and Cambridge as university cities, this article outlines their development strategies.
Competing Interests
Nataliia PROVOTAR:
The author is the editor, therefore, they did not participate in the review and decision-making process regarding the publication of this article.
References
Anderson, J. (2019). Studentification. Human Geography. Cultural Geography and Space. Cardiff University.
Abualrub, I., & Pinheiro, R. (2022). Aligning university roles and strategic orientations. In Universities and Regional Engagement: From the Exceptional to the Everyday (рp. 126-139). New York, Oxon.
Bell, D. & Jayne. M. (ed.). (2006). Small Cities: Urban Experience Beyond The Metropolis. New York, Oxon: Routledge.
Borges, M. J., & Torres, S. B. (2012). Company Towns: Labor, Space, and Power Relations Across Time and Continents. Palgrave Macmillan.
Commander, S. (2018). One-company Towns: Scale and Consequences. IZA World of labor.
Gentrifiering i Lund (2014). Lunds Universitet.
Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the City: How our Greatest Invention Makes us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier. New York, Oxon.
Goddard, J. & Vallance, P. (2013). The University and the City. London: Routledge.
Kenyon, E. L. (1997). Seasonal Sub-Communities: The Impact of Student Households on Residential Communities. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(2), 286-301.
Kinton, C., Smith, D., Harrison, J. & Culora, A. (2018). New frontiers of studentification: the commodification of student housing as a driver of urban change. The Geographical Journal, 184(3), 242-254. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12263
Kinton, C., Smith, D., & Harrison, J. (2016). De-studentification: emptying housing and neighbourhoods of student populations. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(8), 1617-1635. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X1664244.
Korcelli-Olejniczak, E. (2022). Small towns in settlement systems. In The Routledge Handbook of Small Towns (pp. 20-31). New York.
Maruniak, E. et al. (2021). Ukrainian small cities in the perspective of sustainable spatial planning. In The Routledge Handbook of Small Towns (pp. 330-345). New York.
Melhuish, С. (2015). Case Studies in University-led Urban Regeneration. London: UCL Urban Laboratory.
Moore, R. D. (2001). Gentrification and Displacement in Cambridge UK: MA Thesis. Sheffield Hallam University.
Provotar, N., & Volkova, A. (2022). Diversification of the socio-economic and spatial development of a small mono-functional city – the case of the city of Yuzhne, Ukraine. Ekonomichna ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 87, 32-43. [In Ukrainian]. [Провотар Н., Волкова А. Диверсифікація соціально-економічного та просторового розвитку малого монофункціонального міста – кейс міста Южне, Україна. Економічна та соціальна географія. 2022, Вип. 87, С. 24–35]. DOI: 10.17721/2413-7154/2022.87.32-43.
Provotar, N., & Shchuryk, Kh. (2022). The influence of universities on the development of small and medium-sized cities In Professor Yurii Polyanskyi: From the Plakors of Podillia to the Snowy Andes (pp. 98-101). Ternopil. [In Ukrainian]. [Провотар Н.І., Щурик Х.М. Вплив університетів на розвиток малих і середніх міст. Професор Юрій Полянський: від плакорів Поділля до засніжених Анд. Тернопіль, 2022. С. 98–101].
Schlichting, H., von Bodelschwingh, A. & Keßler, O. (ed.). (2013). Studentisches wohnen in Deutschland: kurzgutachten. Berlin: RegioKontext GmbH.
Shchuryk Kh. (2023). Planning the development of student cities: the experience of Lund and Ostrog. In Cities and Regions at the Epicenter of Spatial Changes (pp. 70-71). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian]. [Щурик Х. Планування розвитку студентських міст: досвід Лунда та Острога. Міста та регіони в епіцентрі просторових змін. Київ, 2023. С. 70-71].
Smith, D. (2005). ‘Studentification’: the gentrification factory? In R. Atkinson, & G. Bridge (Eds.), Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism (pp. 72-89). Routledge.
Smith, D., & Hubbard, P. (2014). The segregation of educated youth and dynamic geographies of studentification. Area, 46(1), 92-100. DOI: 10.1111/area.12054.
Smith, D., Sage, J., & Balsdon, S. (2014). The geographies of studentification: ‘Here, there and everywhere’? Geography, 99, 116-127.
Cambridge Ahead: website. URL: https://www.cambridgeahead.co.uk/
Cambridge city council: website. URL: https://www.cambridge.gov.uk/
Cambridgeshire Insight: website. URL: https://cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/
Företagssök. Bizzdo: website. URL: http://surl.li/bvzks
Kulturnportal Lund: website. URL: https://kulturportallund.se/
Lund. Cultural and Creative Cities Monitor: website. URL: https://composite-indicators.jrc.ec.europa.eu/cultural-creative-cities-monitor/countries-and-cities/lund
Lunds kommun. Årsredovisning 2021: website. URL: https://lund.se/kommun-och-politik/kommunens-ekonomi-och-budget/redovisningar/arsredovisning
Lunds kommun: website. URL: https://lund.se/
Office for National Statistics: website. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/
QS World University Rankings 2023: Top global Universities: website. URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2023?qs_qp=topnav
Town vs gown battle in Cambridge over green belt plan to solve housing crisis. The Guardian: website. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/27/cambridge-housing-colleges-development-green-belt
Town vs gown and car vs bike: row erupts over Cambridge congestion plan. The Guardian: website. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/19/town-vs-gown-and-car-vs-bike-row-erupts-over-cambridge-congestion-plan
Troubled waters: The Cambridgeriver dividing town and gown. The Guardian: website. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/jul/11/troubled-waters-the-cambridge-river-dividing-town-and-gown
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nataliia PROVOTAR, Khrystyna SHCHURYK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article and any related published material are available under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish the article.
