INTRODUCTION. URBAN PLANNING PARADIGMS: SHIFT OR PERSISTENCE?

Authors

  • Kostyantyn MEZENTSEV Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Oleksiy GNATIUK Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.6-10

References

Goodspeed, R. (2016). The death and life of collaborative planning theory. Urban Planning, 1(4), 1-5. doi: 10.17645/up.v1i4.715.

Healey, P., McDougall, G., & Thomas, M. (eds). (1982). Planning Theory: Prospects for the 1980s. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kaylor, C. (2005). The State of Local E-Government and E-Democracy: Benchmarking the Progress of U.S. Cities at Providing Online Opportunities for Citizen Engagement. Columbus, OH: Institute for Public Service and Public Policy.

Mandarano, L., Meenar, M., & Steins, C. (2010). Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement. Planning Literature, 25, 123-135. doi: 10.1177/0885412210394102.

Taylor, N. (1999). Anglo-American town planning theory since 1945: three significant developments but no paradigm shifts. Planning Perspectives, 14(4), 327-345. doi: 10.1080/026654399364166

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

MEZENTSEV, K., & GNATIUK, O. (2021). INTRODUCTION. URBAN PLANNING PARADIGMS: SHIFT OR PERSISTENCE?. Ekonomichna Ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 85, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.6-10

Issue

Volume 85 (2021)

Section

Editorials

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Kostyantyn MEZENTSEV, Oleksiy GNATIUK

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The article and any related published material are available under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish the article.