GEOECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE GLOBAL SPREAD OF PROTECTIONISM FOR UKRAINE’S FOREIGN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2026.95.153-184

Keywords:

Ukraine, USA, EU, protectionism, foreign economic activity, international trade, Russo-Ukrainian war

Abstract

The article examines the impact of contemporary global economic transformations on Ukraine’s foreign economic activity under martial law. As a result of the full-scale invasion, the Ukrainian economy has suffered significant losses associated with the destruction of production facilities, disruption of logistics chains, and a reduction in export potential. The role of protectionism is growing as one of the key factors in the transformation of global trade relations, making it an additional destabilizing factor. The purpose of the study is to analyze the geoeconomic consequences of the spread of protectionism and assess its impact on the development of Ukraine’s foreign economic activity. To achieve this goal, the following tasks have been identified: to reveal the theoretical foundations of protectionism, to analyze current trends in its spread in the world economy, and to assess its consequences for Ukraine. The methodological basis is a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, in particular, the processing of sources of statistical information and analytical reports, as well as the generalization of the obtained results using the synthesis method. This allowed us to form a holistic view of current transformations in international trade and their impact on Ukraine’s foreign economic activity. Over the past 15 years, more protectionist measures than trade-liberalizing initiatives have been introduced annually worldwide, indicating the dominance of protectionist trends in global trade policy. This creates significant challenges for Ukraine – narrowing access to foreign markets, strengthening trade barriers, and increasing uncertainty for businesses and investors. Among the possible ways to improve Ukraine's foreign economic activity are strengthening diplomatic efforts, deepening integration with trading partners, and developing the production of products with higher added value.

References

Abboushi, S. (2010). Trade protectionism: reasons and outcomes. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 20(5), 384–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421011080760

Balabanova, N., Muravsky, M., & Shastun, V. (2024). Interstate trade disputes as a manifestation of modern protectionism. Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: Economics, (28), 53–61. [In Ukrainian]. [Балабанова, Н., Муравський, М., & Шастун, В. (2024). Міждержавні торговельні суперечки як прояв сучасного протекціонізму. Вісник Маріупольського державного університету. Серія: Економіка, (28), 53–61]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-2822-2024-14-28-53-61

BBC News Ukraine. (2025a). Trump's tariffs. What they are, why they are needed, and will they help make America great. [In Ukrainian]. [BBC News Україна. (2025а) Тарифи Трампа. Що це таке, навіщо вони потрібні, й чи допоможуть вони зробити Америку великою]. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/articles/c93lew7wje9o

BBC News Ukraine. (2025b). Trump's tariffs on Ukraine. Are they painful and how will they hit the economy. [In Ukrainian]. [BBC News Україна (2025б). Мита Трампа щодо України. Чи це болюче і як вдарить по економіці]. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/articles/cd02g31mjz5o

Butenko, O., Kot, О. & Kozub, V. (2025). The impact of non-tariff barriers of the eu on the export of key agrarian goods of Ukraine. Journal of European Economy, 24(4), 579–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2025.04.579

Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A., & Ruta, M. (2020). The global trade slowdown: cyclical or structural?. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 121–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx027

Crozet, M. (2009). Trade and geography: Paul Krugman's views on globalization. Review of Political Economy, 119(4), 513–534. [In French]. [Crozet, M. (2009). Commerce et géographie: la mondialisation selon Paul Krugman. Revue d economie politique, 119(4), 513–534]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.194.0513

CRS Products from the Library of Congress. (2025). The International Emergency Economic Powers Act: Origins, Evolution, and Use. URL: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45618

CRS Products from the Library of Congress. (2026). Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. URL: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11346

Cutrini, E., Gardiner, B., & Martin, R. (2023). EU integration and the geographies of economic activity: 1985–2019. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(2), 274–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221127028

Datt, M., Hoekman, B., & Malouche, M. (2011). Taking stock of trade protectionism since 2008. World Bank-Economic Premise, (72), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/10068

European Commission. (n.d.). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. URL: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en

European Commission. (2025). EU and Ukraine reach agreement in principle on a modernised trade relationship. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_1672

Evans, O. (2019). The effects of US-China trade war and Trumponomics. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(1), 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO1_3

Forbes Ukraine. (2025). The European Parliament voted to extend duty-free imports of Ukrainian steel for three years. [In Ukrainian]. [Forbes Ukraine (2025). Європарламент проголосував за продовження на три роки безмитного імпорту української сталі]. URL: https://forbes.ua/news/evroparlament-progolosuvav-za-prodovzhennya-na-tri-roki-bezmitnogo-importu-ukrainskoi-stali-08052025-29596

Hornung, L.J., & Stöckmann, N. (2024) Protectionism in Disguise? EU Anti-Dumping Measures Targeting PRC Iron and Steel Products. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-024-00433-6

Koopman, R. (2025). The likely micro-and macro-economic consequences of a unilateral US trade policy. World Trade Review, 24(4), 446–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745625101067

Mazaraki, А., & Меlnyk, Т. (2021). Neo-protectionism and trade wars. Scientia fructuosa, 135 (1), 4–22. [In Ukrainian]. [Мазаракі, А., Мельник, Т. (20210. Неопротекціонізм і торговельні війни. Scientia fructuosa, 135(1), 4–22]. DOI: http://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2021(135)01

Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2026a). Current anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures against Ukrainian products. [In Ukrainian]. [Міністерство економіки, довкілля та сільського господарства України. (2026а). Чинні антидемпінгові, компенсаційні та захисні заходи щодо української продукції]. URL: https://bit.ly/3QBCs7Q

Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2026b). Official notifications of decisions of the Interdepartmental Commission on International Trade. [In Ukrainian]. [Міністерство економіки, довкілля та сільського господарства України. (2026б). Офіційні повідомлення про рішення Міжвідомчої комісії з міжнародної торгівлі]. URL: https://bit.ly/3SWFt3n

Movchan, V., Giucci, R., & Nivievskiy, O. (2025). DCFTA revision: changes in EU TRQs for UKR products and effect on the EU. URL: https://www.german-economic-team.com/en/publication/dcfta-revision-changes-in-eu-trqs-for-ukr-products-and-effect-on-the-eu/

National Bank of Ukraine. (n.d.). External Sector Statistics. [In Ukranian]. [Національний банк України (n.d.). Статистика зовнішнього сектору]. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/sector-external

Pugachevska, K., Medvid, L., Goblyk-Markovych, N., Feier, O., & Lyzanets, A. (2023). Protectionism in conditions of world trade multipolarity. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(49), 253–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.2.49.2023.3987

Rickard, S. J. (2022). Economic geography, politics, and the world trade regime. World Trade Review, 21(3), 367-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000040

Schilirò, D. (2025). Globalization, Tariffs, and Deglobalization. International Journal of Business Management and Finance Research, 8(5), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53935/2641-5313.v8i5.500

Sirel Öztürk, N. (2026). From liberalization to fragmentation: new evidence on global tariff dynamics in the WTO era. International Trade, Politics and Development, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITPD-12-2025-0065

The Associated Press. (2020). Trump trade policy: 4 years of high drama. Limited results. URL: https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-virus-outbreak-global-trade-trade-policy-mexico-39aadae9a6d18de2b91889f1e552b605

The Global Trade Alert. (n.d.). URL: https://globaltradealert.org/

The Hill. (2025). The US consumers shouldering 55 percent of Trump tariff costs: Goldman Sachs. URL: https://thehill.com/business/5553384-trump-tariffs-consumer-costs-goldman-sachs/

World Bank Blogs. (2024). Global trade has nearly flatlined. Populism is taking a toll on growth. URL: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/voices/global-trade-has-nearly-flatlined-populism-taking-toll-growth

World Bank Group. (2026). Middle East War to Spark Biggest Energy Price Surge in Four Years. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/04/28/commodity-markets-outlook-april-2026-press-release

York, E. (2024). Trump, Biden and the American protectionist matrix. Le Grand Continent. [In French]. [Trump, Biden et la matrice protectionniste américaine. Le Grand Continent]. URL: https://legrandcontinent.eu/fr/2024/04/24/trump-biden-et-la-matrice-protectionniste-americaine/

York, E., & Durante, A. (2026). Tracking the Impact of the Trump Tariffs & Trade War. Tax Foundation. URL: https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/

Yurchyshyn, V. (2019). Modern Trade Wars and Their Impact on Economic Growth and Development in the World and Ukraine. Kyiv: Zapovit. [In Ukrainian]. [Юрчишин, В. (2019). Торговельні війни сучасності та їх вплив на економічне зростання і розвиток у світі та Україні. Київ: Заповіт. 190 с.]. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2019_trade_wars.pdf

Yurydychna Gazeta. (2025). Return of tariff quotas from the EU: what changes for Ukrainian farmers after June 6, 2025. [In Ukrainian]. [Юридична газета. (2025). Повернення тарифних квот з ЄС: що змінюється для українських аграріїв після 6 червня 2025 року]. URL: https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/povernennya-tarifnih-kvot-z-es-shcho-zminyuetsya-dlya-ukrayinskih-agrariyiv-pislya-6-chervnya-2025-r.html

Zafar, A. (2025). Protectionism, power, and the erosion of WTO discipline: Legal and economic lessons from the trade wars. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101983

Zubko, T. (2026). Ukraine-EU trade under global fluctuations. Scientia fructuosa, 165 (1), 33–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2026(165)03

Downloads

Published

2026-07-14

How to Cite

ULIGANETS, S., & DANYLEVSKYI, A. (2026). GEOECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE GLOBAL SPREAD OF PROTECTIONISM FOR UKRAINE’S FOREIGN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES. Ekonomichna Ta Sotsialna Geografiya, 95, 153–184. https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2026.95.153-184

Issue

Section

Articles